Home > News Center > Publications > EnVision
Toward Computational Cell Biology |
|
PROJECT LEADERS
Nathan A. Baker Michael J. Holst, UC San Diego |
PARTICIPANTS
Burak Aksoylu |
Feng Wang
UCLA and UC San Diego |
|
SOLVING MOLECULAR PUZZLES
|
![]() |
Figure 1. Actin Filament Electrostatic Potential
The solution for the negative (red) and positive (blue) electrostatic potential of a 30-mer actin filament (top) and a 10-mer filament (bottom), obtained by David Sept of UC San Diego's Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry using a structure supplied in K. Holmes, D. Popp, W. Gebhard, and W. Kabsch (1990): Atomic model of the actin filament. Nature 347, 44-49. |
![]() |
|
| The algorithms are an adaptive finite-element computer program called the Manifold Code, developed by Holst, an associate professor in the Scientific Computation Group of the Department of Mathematics, and an Adaptive Poisson-Boltzmann Solver (APBS), developed by Baker. The codes permit the calculation of the electric potential of arbitrarily complex structures. Baker and colleagues in the group of J. Andrew McCammon, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, collaborated with Holst and other members of the Scientific Computation Group to adapt the Manifold Code via APBS for biological problems. |
SOLVING MOLECULAR PUZZLES
|
Top | Contents | Next REFERENCES N. Baker, D. Sept, M. Holst, and J.A. McCammon (2000): The adaptive multilevel finite element solution of the Poisson-Boltzmann equation on massively parallel computers, IBM Systems Journal (submitted). R. Bank and M. Holst (2000): A new paradigm for parallel adaptive meshing algorithms, SIAM J. Sci. Computing (in press). M. Holst, N. Baker, and F. Wang (2000): Adaptive multilevel finite element solution of the Poisson-Boltzmann equation I: Algorithms and examples, J. Comput. Chem. (in press). M. Holst, N. Baker, and F. Wang (2000): Adaptive multilevel finite element solution of the Poisson-Boltzmann equation II: Refinement at solvent accessible surfaces in biomolecular systems, J. Comput. Chem. (in press). |
THE MANIFOLD CODE AND THE MULTIMOLECULAR
|
Top | Contents | Nextmccammon.ucsd.edu |
![]() |
Figure 2. Microtubule Electrostatic Potential
The protein backbone of a 15-protofilament microtubule (top), the structure of which is based on coordinates from Eva Nogales of UC Berkeley and HHMI and Ken Downing of Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. Four views (bottom) of the negative (red) and positive (blue) electrostatic potential contours obtained by solving the Poisson-Boltzmann equation for the same microtubule. |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
ACTIN AND MICROTUBULESMuch bigger problems presented themselves in the form of actin and tubulin. Actin monomers, the most abundant protein in the cell, and tubulin dimers, which constitute the microtubules that transport proteins throughout a cell (among many other functions), are both highly conserved globular proteins. "Since they are such important components of all eukaryotic cells, we wanted to take a computational look at them," Baker said. Actin filaments, together with associated proteins, are important in controlling cell shape, motility, and transport. They were first found in muscle tissue and, together with myosin and other proteins, supply the mechanism of muscle contraction. Baker and Sept used APBS and the Manifold Code to investigate the electrostatic properties of an actin filament (Figure 1). By contrast with actin filaments, microtubules appear to be constituted to resist compressive forces, and they perform dynamic intracellular functions. Microtubules, for example, pull at the spindles formed during cell division (mitosis). "A drug like taxol operates by binding to microtubules and disrupting the division of cancer cells," Sept said. "A more complete understanding of these structures should be helpful in structure-based drug discovery." Sept and Baker used Blue Horizon to calculate the electrostatic potential of a 15-protofilament microtubule (Figure 2). Some of these calculations involved nearly a million atoms, and runs on up to 32 processors permitted the use of a mesh refined into more than 6 million simplices. "The calculational box was 90 nanometers on a side," Baker said, "and the smallest simplex had a longest edge of 0.088 nanometers." "These are very exciting calculations," McCammon said. "We are now analyzing them with a view to pushing the envelope further and tackling a number of large-scale problems in intracellular activity." |
Top | Contents | Next |
ASSESSING THE POTENTIAL"A faster PBE solver that can maintain solution accuracy has certainly been needed," Baker said, "especially as we extend our domains to accommodate multiple molecules, multimolecular interactions, and processes occurring on subcellular scales." "Many investigators have been using scaled-up molecular simulation codes to look at multimolecular interactions," said McCammon, "and now we can contribute mightily to the realism and accuracy of such studies, with rapid and accurate determinations of the electrostatic potential of structures and processes of major biological and pharmacological importance." The approach taken by Bank and Holst to the parallelization reduced interprocessor communication to a minimum and improved load balancing. "Our codes were written as sequential codes, but they can run in a parallel environment without a large investment in recoding," Holst said. Most important, according to Holst and Baker, is that the use of multilevel finite-element methods yields orders of magnitude reductions in solution time compared to uniform mesh approaches. "We had been working for years on new and better computational solutions for the elliptical partial differential equations that arise in many scientific problems," said Holst, "and we were just delighted to find that Andy McCammon's group was pursuing exactly the right problems to test our ability to deliver accurate numerical solutions in a computationally efficient fashion--despite the well-known difficulty of the problems." --MM * |
Top | Contents | Next |